Aalberg, T., Duchateau, F., Takhirov, N., Decourselle, J., & Lumineau, N. (2018). Benchmarking and evaluating the interpretation of bibliographic records.
International Journal on Digital Libraries.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-018-0233-2Boissonnas, C. M. (1979). The quality of OCLC bibliographic records: The Cornell Law Library experience. Law Library Journal, 72, 80–85.
Bruce, T. R., & Hillmann, D. I. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: defining, expressing, exploiting. In D. I. Hillmann & E. Westbrooks (Eds.),
Metadata in Practice. Retrieved from
https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/7895Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
David, R. H., & Thomas, D. (2015). Assessing metadata and controlling quality in scholarly ebooks.
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly,
53(7), 801–824.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1018397Debattista, J., Lange, C., Auer, S., & Cortis, D. (2018). Evaluating the quality of the LOD cloud: An empirical investigation.
Semantic Web,
9(6), 859–901.
https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-180306Decourselle, J., Duchateau, F., Aalberg, T., Takhirov, N., & Lumineau, N. (2016). Open datasets for evaluating the interpretation of bibliographic records.
Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 253–254.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2910896.2925457El-Sherbini, M. (2010). Program for cooperative cataloging: BIBCO records: analysis of quality.
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly,
48(2–3), 221–236.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903535726Färber, M., Bartscherer, F., Menne, C., & Rettinger, A. (2017). Linked data quality of DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO.
Semantic Web,
9(1), 77–129.
https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-170275Fürber, C., & Hepp, M. (2011). SWIQA – a Semantic Web information quality assessment framework.
ECIS 2011 Proceedings, 13. Retrieved from
https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1075&context=ecis2011Gavrilis, D., Makri, D.-N., Papachristopoulos, L., Angelis, S., Kravvaritis, K., Papatheodorou, C., & Constantopoulos, P. (2015). Measuring quality in metadata repositories. In S. Kapidakis, C. Mazurek, & M. Werla (Eds.), Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (pp. 56–67). Springer International Publishing.
Hider, P., & Tan, K.-C. (2008). Constructing record quality measures based on catalog use.
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly,
46(4), 338–361.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370802322515Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure.
International Journal of Qualitative Methods,
8(4), 49–62.
https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406Library of Congress. (2016, April 21). Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 model [Webpage]. Retrieved February 18, 2019, from
http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.htmlMoen, W. E., Stewart, E. L., & McClure, C. R. (1998). Assessing metadata quality: findings and methodological considerations from an evaluation of the US Government Information Locator Service (GILS).
Proceedings IEEE International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries -ADL’98-, 246–255.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ADL.1998.670425Ochoa, X., & Duval, E. (2009). Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories.
International Journal on Digital Libraries,
10(2), 67–91.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-009-0054-4Pipino, L. L., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). Data quality assessment.
Communications of the ACM,
45(4), 211.
https://doi.org/10.1145/505248.506010Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M. B., & Smith, L. C. (2007). A framework for information quality assessment.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
58(12), 1720–1733.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20652Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers.
Journal of Management Information Systems,
12(4), 5–33.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099Zhu, H., Lee, Y. W., & Rosenthal, A. S. (2016). Data standards challenges for interoperable and quality data.
J. Data and Information Quality,
7(1–2), 4:1–4:3.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2903723