Issue raised by: Ronald van der Meer
For result set names there is no note such as (nor contrary to) the note
quoted above. Result set names are significantly different than
database names in their usage. Database names are passed around outside
of the protocol, often by humans, and transcend Z-associations. Result
set names have none of these characteristics. They are referred to only
by the origin (the mapping between user specified names and actual
result set names used in the protocol are not within the scope of the
Z39.50 protocol), within an association, and the origin should be
capable of using a given result set name consistently within an
association.
Synopsis:
Are database and result set names case sensitive?
Response:
Database names are not case sensitive: See 3.2.2.1.2
Database-names note 2:
"Each database name specified by the target is a
string of characters, and the string is case-insensitive. That
is, for any character that is a letter, the origin may use either
upper or lower case, regardless of how the target has specified
the name."
Result set names are deemed to be case sensitive.
Status: Approved (8/97)
Library
of Congress
(10/22/97)